Should Victim Participation in the ICC be Regulated?


When one thinks of the International Criminal Court, perhaps the words justice, accountability, and wrongdoers come to mind. However, the words “victim participation” should also be in the back of one’s mind. The ICC has been in existence for ten years now, and its most “interesting” aspect is the fact that victim’s have the opportunity to be heard there. The ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence allow for victims to participate in the criminal process, “regardless of whether they are witnesses or not.” Due to the ten year anniversary of the ICC, a conference was held to reflect on its work, and it was established that while victim participation is helpful, it comes with its own set of problems. For one, the manner in which these victims can participate is not designated in the rules, which means that the ICC has generous discretion to decide the impact that victim participation will have in an individual case. This uncertainty, however, has led to “fragmented and inconsistent case law.”

One way to resolve this issue, and perhaps the simplest, is to codify victim’s rights, so that all are “afforded that same rights and modalities of participation.”

A second way to resolve this issue is to follow what Trial Chamber V’s Decision did just a few weeks ago (October 3, 2012). There, because of the large number of potential participating victims, the court decided that the Legal Representative for Victims and the Victims Participation and Reparations Section was to create a “register” of victims:

“those who want to appear before the Court either physically or via video-link will be required to fill out the application form. Incidentally such victims would be forced to relinquish their identity to the defence.”

The judges held that it was “too cumbersome” for them (or the parties) to review the individual application forms. However true that may be, those judges seem to have disregarded “the cathartic value that it may have for some victims to fill in the particulars of the harm suffered.” A third possibility then, which has been used, is allowing collective victim applications.


Is consistency in victim participation in ICC cases something that needs to be regulated? Is there more of a need for this in cases with hundreds or thousands of victims?


Is codification the answer? Is having victims register the answer?


What are the potential downsides of these remedies?


Victim Participation in ICC is Crucial


  1. There is no doubt that victim participation is crucial to the ICC process. Usually, the victim’s view and the view of the prosecution are one in the same, but the victim’s insight into the situation that the ICC is investigating provides a backbone for the case. Codifying victim’s rights seems to be a good solution. In regards to the “register” of victims, it could be unsafe or even problematic in all cases for the victims to have to reveal their identity to the defense. Collective victim application seems to be the best option because it would increase efficiency and additionally present a united front. Since the ICC is a fairly new governing body, a modification to the way that the victims are involved in the process seems to be warranted. As long as they still have a vital role in the proceedings, regulation would only help the prosecutorial process as a whole and help build up the credibility of the ICC.

  2. One of the biggest and most interesting differences of the ICC is that victims can participate in the criminal process. It is an aspect of the ICC that sets them apart from other courts, and I do not think it should be abolished all together. Regulation, on the other hand, seems to be a better alternative. The cases that the ICC prosecutes almost always have a large number of victims. The ICC focuses on war crimes and crimes of humanity, and these crimes usually generate a large victim pool. However, the courts cannot be compelled to hear from every victim individually. It would take up too much of the courts time, and instead they could be deciding other cases that need their attention. A collective victim application may be the best option. This can only help the prosecution build a stronger case against the accused. It also allows the victims to speak for themselves and play an important role in obtaining justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *